A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal web-site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has captivated national awareness subsequent an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development is effective at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, seek out to develop their family residence. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying produced by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such locations are subject matter to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, notably inside a sensitive coastal environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly built, is in the proper placement. Their authorized team has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal setting up disputes, where by views of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual evidence on the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments described, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water throughout serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the location grew to become Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting instead that it's about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing connection to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple simply just endeavoring to produce a loved ones house in accordance Using the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Specific Region of Conservation and say that every one operates have been completed according to Experienced tips and approved options. Their lawyers Rene Collier and Paul Feely have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that a lot of observers see as progressively prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the lawful fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. It also underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues for instance environmental security and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of all-natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partly crafted, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. Whether or not it is going to ultimately be altered, taken off, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s findings. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will likely continue on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin lately.